Adam Before and After the Fall - Perfecting of the Saints
We will show how the fall fits into God's plan for man up to the Genesis 1 portrays the big picture, the role Adam and Eve were to play in relation to the entire creation. .. In the process, Christ will suffer a bruised heel, an injury our Lord Job serves as an illustration of the wisdom of God in allowing sin. The relationship between God and Mankind is totally unique. God is sovereign. A sovereign is a government. This means that God is the ruler of mankind. In an attempt to explain his relationship with God, man often relies on We were bought with a special price—“the precious blood of Jesus Christ” (1 Peter ).
Genesis 1 and 2 The more I study the early chapters of Genesis the more convinced I have become of their purpose. Providing a scientific explanation of creation 39 is not the purpose of chapters 1 and 2. Rather, their purpose is to set the scene for the fall of man, a major turning point in the history of creation.
Man was created by God to rule over His creation: And God saw all that He had made, and behold, it was very good. And there was evening and there was morning, the sixth day Genesis 1: Adam and his wife were to rule over the earth. Genesis 1 portrays the big picture, the role Adam and Eve were to play in relation to the entire creation. Genesis 2 narrows the focus to the garden of Eden. Adam was placed in the garden to cultivate or keep it.
Eating its fruit would give the partaker a knowledge of good and evil, but it would also certainly produce his or her death. When God formed every creature from the dust of the ground, He caused each to pass before Adam for him to name. Each had its own mate, its counter-part.
These pairs of creatures were able to procreate and fulfill the mandate to multiply and fill the earth. Not so with Adam. He too needed a counterpart--a wife. God wanted Adam to sense this need, and then joyfully receive the one whom He fashioned to meet his need. After showing Adam his need for a helper, God created one. Neither Adam nor Eve had parents.
Eve had no tie to her parents, but only union with her husband. Because of the nature of this first relationship between Adam and Eve, Moses parenthetically interjects the principle that when a man and woman come together, the husband must subordinate the tie he once had with his parents to the tie he now has with his wife verse Before studying the fall of man in Genesis 3, let us pause to reflect on the setting described in the first two chapters.
Genesis 1 serves as a commentary on the fall of man in chapter 3. According to this account, all of creation came into existence in response to one thing: God spoke creation into existence.
Genesis 2 likewise is most significant when read in light of chapter 3. But all of chapter 2 denies what Eve assumed about God. Chapter 2 has a prominent theme: God provides what is lacking and necessary. No shrubs or trees were yet on the earth in chapter 2 verse 4. There was no rain to water the plants or a man present to cultivate the land.
God therefore planted a garden with trees providing all that was needed, a river for irrigation, and a man to cultivate the land. There was also a need for a helper for Adam, and so God fashioned the perfect mate. At every point of legitimate need, God created what was needed. How, then, dare Satan suggest or Eve believe that God had withheld something from her which she needed? The Fall of Man: Genesis 3 Now the serpent was more crafty than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made.
Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together and made themselves loin coverings. And they heard the sound of the Lord God walking in the garden in the cool of the day, and the man and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the Lord God among the trees of the garden.
Have you eaten from the tree of which I commanded you not to eat? And the Lord God made garments of skin for Adam and his wife, and clothed them.
So He drove the man out; and at the east of the garden of Eden He stationed the cherubim, and the flaming sword which turned every direction, to guard the way to the tree of life Genesis 3: This lesson seeks to view the fall of man in the light of the overall plan of God for creation.
1. God loves you and created you to know Him personally.
Therefore, although a more detailed exposition of the text would be most profitable, we must limit ourselves to a few observations and comments. Hopefully, they will serve as a stimulus for your additional study.
Genesis 3 appears to have no struggle at all. Neither Eve nor Adam raise so much as one word of protest or argument against Satan.
They appear to be easy prey for his cunning attack. Adam, come over here. Even in his unfallen state, man was no match for the wiles of Satan. The leader followed, and the followers led. Adam, Eve, creature which surely includes the serpent. The order of actions related to the fall are: When God confronts those responsible for the fall, the order is that of His chain-of-command: Adam verse 9Eve verse 13the serpent verse Eve did not know what she was doing as Adam did.
Rather than assume responsibility for their own actions, Adam and Even passed the responsibility on. From their actions in Genesis 3: The forbidden fruit was now seen as desirable even though it was deadly. The tree of life was overshadowed by the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.
The Word of God which so recently brought the universe into existence see 1: Why was the tree of the knowledge of good and evil forbidden?
The tree of the knowledge of good and evil enabled one to know good and evil see 3: Eve only needed to know that God had forbidden the fruit of this tree. Had Eve trusted God, she would have found His Word sufficient. She needed only to know who had forbidden the fruit, not why the fruit was forbidden.
Eve needed only to know what God had said--she did not need to understand why the fruit of that one tree was forbidden. There is an important principle to be seen here: God desires from us the obedience of faith. Such obedience is not based upon our understanding of why we are to act as God requires, but simply because it is God who requires it. The obedience of faith is based on our faith in God, not on our understanding of why God calls one thing good and another evil.
Parents teach their children to obey on the same basis. You cannot explain to a young child why an electrical outlet is dangerous. You can only forbid them to touch it, because you said so, and because they trust your word. How quickly we shake our heads and point our finger at Eve.
We say we desire to obey God, but we want to understand why we should obey Him before we do.
We want to understand why God has commanded some things and prohibited others. One example relates directly to our text. Let the women keep silent in the churches; for they are not permitted to speak, but let them subject themselves, just as the Law also says.
And if they desire to learn anything, let them ask their own husbands at home; for it is improper for a woman to speak in church. Was it from you that the word of God first went forth? Or has it come to you only?
Grace Fellowship Church: Toronto, ON, Canada > The God Ordained Relationship Between Men & Women
Therefore I want the men in every place to pray, lifting up holy hands, without wrath and dissension. Likewise, I want women to adorn themselves with proper clothing, modestly and discreetly, not with braided hair and gold or pearls or costly garments; but rather by means of good works, as befits women making a claim to godliness.
Let a woman quietly receive instruction with entire submissiveness. But I do not allow a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man, but to remain quiet. But God hath revealed them unto us by His Spirit; for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God. For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? Even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God 1 Corinthians 2: If I have a will to know certain scientific facts, by my human spirit I am enabled to investigate, think, and weigh evidence.
If I set myself to the task, I may become a scientist of world-renown and of great accomplishments. The natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God; for they are foolishness unto him; neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned 1 Corinthians 2: When the will is surrendered, the Holy Spirit takes up His abode in the spirit of man.
And when that transaction takes place we will know it, for, says Paul: Many people confess that they get nothing out of the Bible even though they attend church and read their Bibles regularly.
Perhaps they do not know that they are not regenerated and that they need to yield their will to the Spirit of God so that He can renew their human spirits. The deep things of God never will be understood by the world outside of Jesus Christ.
Our Lord warned His disciples, Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine Matthew 7: The spirit of the unregenerate man has no more capacity to appreciate the things of God than a dog has to appreciate holy things, or a hog a genuine pearl necklace.
This they did because the dog was a dog and the sow was a sow.
5. The Fall of Man in God's Perfect Plan | vlozodkaz.info
No amount of religion or church activity can change the spirit of the unregenerate man. We gave holy things to dogs. We cast the pearls of the Kingdom before swine. Here we are told that it is the spirit of man that is given understanding.
Such is not the case. The spirit of man is his personality and it is that which differentiates him from the lower animal creation. It is by his spirit that the Christian both serves and worships God. The Soul Man not only has a living soul but he is a living soul.
We must be careful not to confound that which is truly spiritual and that which is merely soulish or psychical. We have seen that the spirit of man is the sphere of activity where the Holy Spirit operates in regeneration.
This is important to notice because in every single instance the one doing the naming has implicit authority over the one being named. Once woman is created, the same process occurs again, as woman is brought by God to man, and man names her 2: Obviously, as has already been stated, she is one in nature with man "bone of my bones, flesh of my flesh" and every bit as much an image-bearer of God as man 1: In fact, she, with Adam in 1: She is one with him and created from him, an image-bearer of God, but there is still a role distinction made, as man is pictured as the one to have authority over the woman.
When God created the human race man and womanhe named them together, "Man" not "Woman" Gen. God could well have given humanity a gender-neutral name, such as "humankind," but he did not. With this perspective, knowing that God named them "Man" when they were created, this makes proper sense of 1: After the sin of Eve and Adam, God came looking specifically for Adam to give account.
Even though Eve was the deceived, the first to sin, and the one to lead them into sin, God demanded that Adam give account. It is also significant that the Serpent spoke to Eve first, as if to invert the order God had decreed Gen. According to the biblical account, Eve was created by God to be a helper for Adam.
The term "helper" Hebrew 'ezer is not necessarily a term of subordination. In fact, it is quite often used of God himself as Israel's helper throughout the OT. However, the one who is helping, for that time is seen to put himself in subordination to the one primarily responsible for the task at hand.
According to Genesis 2, however, Eve was not Adam's helper on occasion, but was in fact created for the very purpose of being Adam's helper.
She would be Adam's helper in the carrying out of the charge already given to Adam 2: Despite the purpose of being a helper to Adam and Adam being the one bearing primary responsibility for the carrying out of the charge given by God, Eve is still very much seen as Adam's equal, and in no way inferior because of her role distinction.
The curse in no way introduced new roles for men and women, but rather, it simply perverted roles already established. The verses have incredible resemblances in structure and vocabulary and the latter is probably written with the purpose of recalling the former in the mind of the original reader. In both of these contexts, it seems that this construction means "an aggressive desire, perhaps a desire to conquer or rule over, or else an urge or impulse to oppose or act against.
It almost without exception implies rule by strength and force, often in an oppressive fashion. Thus, sin resulted in a perversion of the God-given roles of joyful "helping" and loving "providing for". As a result of sin, woman would desire to usurp her husband's authority hate him for it and the husband would rule the home and the world oppressively, in a harsh manner, by force of strength.
Furthermore, the consequences meted out make all the more sense when put into this relational context. Woman would now have pain introduced to her area of responsibility "in pain you shall bring forth children"and man now has pain in his area of responsibility "in pain you shall eat of [the ground] all the days of your life". Thus we have pain introduced to the relationship between them the conflict and pain introduced in each of their areas of responsibility.
After the grand act of redemption and the re-ordering of things in Christ, we would expect to find the effects of the curse undone completely.
And thus we do, affirms Paul: Husbands, love your wives, and do not be harsh with them" Col. This statement is a direct command to undo the impulses created in the fall to oppose or to usurp and to rule harshly. A "mystery" in the writings of Paul generally refers to something understood vaguely, if at all, in the OT, but has been made clear in Christ. Thus, he refers to marriage as a reflection of Christ and the Church. Paul does not look at the culture surrounding him to analogize marriage, but to the perfect order of things in the Garden prior to the fall to instruct his readers how to live in marriage now in the NT.
Paul quotes from Genesis 2 "'For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh' Gen. This mystery is a profound one, but I am saying that it refers to Christ and the church" Eph.
In other words, the relationship of husband and wife just described Eph.
- Adam Before and After the Fall
- Relationship with God
- The God Ordained Relationship Between Men & Women
Neither Male nor Female Galatians 3: After all, if it really did abolish gender distinctions, then how could homosexuality be wrong? Rather, the text says that in Christ, all were purchased at the same price the context of the book is obviously justificationand in creation all were equally made in the image of God Gen. Mutual Submission Mutual submission, as presented by egalitarians so as to abolish the existence of an authority within a relationshipdoes not fit with the flow of Paul's argument in Eph.
Although it sometimes can indicate this cf. In light of the particularly odd construction "submit unilaterally to one in authority to one another" it must be deemed best to allow the context the ellipsis in the original undisputedly indicates a continuation of thought from 5: It is also the best option contextually because it moves best with the flow of thought in Eph.
Furthermore, if the idea of mutual submission was the original intent of Paul, then it must also be applied to Christ and the church Paul's own divinely inspired illustration. This is a concept that is never attested to anywhere in the Bible and seems illogical at best and blasphemous at worst. It is also notable that in the explanations of authority relationships that follow Eph. The husband loves his wife vvthe father does not provoke his children 6: This is further proof that Paul clearly has in mind relationships with a source of unilateral authority and does not desire the abolition of those authority structures.
The idea of mutual submission overruling a wife's submission to her husband as one in an authority position is also inconsistent with other instructions on ordering the NT home Col. None of the other passages which carry such instructions for the authority of the husband include any statement that would even vaguely suggest "mutual submission.
Nowhere in Scripture is such a statement even hinted at. Nevertheless, the commands for wives to submit to husbands are multiple. The classical complementarian position is established therefore by allowing Scripture to interpret itself as Eph. This is much preferred over the egalitarian argument which pits a false Greek construction of Eph.
This is rejected outright for the following three reasons: